Commenting on Students' Responses to the NETS-T

I enjoyed reading my students' blogs today. They had to write a post comparing the NETS-T of 2008 with the NETS-T of 2000. They also had to determine where the use of images fit into the NETS-T 2008. Here are some of the trends I saw:

On where images fit into the NETS-T, many of you commented about the need to cite sources, that one shouldn’t just take an image from a site on the Internet and use it. Our students need to understand about copyright issues too. A few mentioned that images may appeal to student creativity, that using images appeals to a variety of learners, and that in fact, the use of images fits into any of the standards. Well done.

We’ll watch a video on copyright this week since this is a major concern. Copyright is part of our digital citizenship unit, which we will start working on. By the way, there are resources in the Course Materials wiki for images that you can use from the Internet. Some need to be cited, some do not.

The comparisons between the NETS-T 2000 and 2008 elicited some great responses:

One person thought that the old standards appeared to written and adopted quickly. Another opined that the old standards might have been more of a precautionary measure rather than a real attempt to address the appropriate use of technology in the classroom.

To summarize more of your responses, the NETS-T 2008 are more technology-focused, less rigid, and address diversity as compared to the NETS-T 2000. In the 8-10 years between the development of the two sets of standards, the world has changed –exponentially- and the new standards attempt to address those changes.

We have a profusion of devices, websites, and applications. There is greater connection throughout the world. Tom Friedman’s book, “The World is Flat”, addresses that notion. Daniel Pink’s book, “A Whole New Brain” gives implications for what it means to thrive in this new era. I recommend both these books to you if you want more depth on where the world and education are heading.

We have been developing the context for educational technology in the 21^st century. I think you all pretty much have a sense of why the new standards are the way they are. That being said, now what do we do?

We’ve begun to explore that process. We are using some of the new tools. Our blogs are in a public space so that we can connect with a global community if anyone happens to notice us.

Here’s the rub: it's natural to:

1. Teach the way we were taught and

2. Teach the way we learn best

Our children are growing up in a different world than we grew up in. It's like teaching children from a different culture. And many who go into teaching happen to like the way school was for them. It’s perhaps harder for us to see how that model has never served all students well. So, technology offers a way to disrupt our thinking about education and approach teaching and learning differently.

I am not sure how this is going to work for all of us. And I intend to continue this experiment. One of the reasons I ask for weekly feedback is so I can see how I’m doing and adjust accordingly.