Wednesday, March 22, 2017

CTC Ed Tech News March 22, 2017

Dear Colleagues,

I have been doing some reading on Universal Design for Learning (UDL). UDL is a set of principles for curriculum development that give all individuals equal opportunities to learn. One of the three design principles of UDL is to provide multiple means of engagement. The two articles I reference below illustrate this principle. 

Participation Points by Stephanie Almagno

One professor's efforts to engage student with the course materials:  Stephanie Almagno starts out by rebranding her expectations as engagement, rather than participation points with the goal "to move students from grade seekers (passive regurgitation of information—written or verbal) to knowledge seekers (independent, engaged learners who see, reflect on, and share their thoughts on the complexity of problems/situations)."  She defines engagement as preparation plus participation.  An engagement rubric is included in the article along with suggestions on how to acknowledge quiet learners.  

This thoughtful take on dealing with digital distractions in the classroom leads links the ongoing struggle between "our ability to create and plan high-level goals versus our ability to control our minds."  Lang references a new book on distraction and attention, The Distracted Mind: Ancient Brains in a High-Tech World  by neuroscientist Gazzaley and psychologist Rosen. Lang states, "The Distracted Mind provides a broader context: Distraction occurs, the authors argue, when we are pursuing a goal that really matters and something blocks our efforts to achieve it."  

The article is a thoughtful read on how our brains work and why distractions are so powerful. I will be reading this book. 

Professional Development Opportunities

Academic Innovations and eLearning is offering the following courses:

Quality Matters: Applying the QM Rubric (APPQMR) Workshop

March 24 through April 7 – online only
Enrollment ends Wednesday, March 22, at 6 p.m.

The Applying the Quality Matters Rubric (APPQMR) workshop is a rigorous, two-week, asynchronous online course.  Participants will learn to use the Quality Matters (QM) rubric and how its standards can help improve the design of online courses. The time commitment for the workshop is 10-12 hours each week of the two-week course. This workshop is the first required step in becoming a certified peer reviewer. Register here by 6 p.m. today, March 22.

Contact Debbi Canavan at dacanavan@alaska.edu for more information.

Tech Fellows 2017

ePortfolio Intensive May 11-12, 2017 (at UAA)
Course Design & Development Intensive May 15-17, 2017 (at UAA)
Monthly Meetings in AY 17/18
Enrollment ends March 30

The Technology Fellows program encourages student achievement through technology-engaged learning. While the central purpose of the Technology Fellows program is course redesign, the 2017 Tech Fellows cohort will focus on Making Learning Visible, one of CAFE's signature programs.

 2013 and Earlier Blackboard Courses to be Purged

Fall 2013 and older Blackboard course shells will be deleted by IT Services on April 15, 2017 per UAA policy (see Section V.6).


All 2013 courses are found at bbarchive.uaa.alaska.edu.  You may archive your course content using these instructions. To request a course not be deleted, contact the IT Services Call Center:

Local (907) 786-4646, option 1 

Toll Free (877) 633-3888, option 1 

 

Lee
Lee Maria Henrikson
Instructional Designer
UAA Community and Technical College
Building Alaska's Workforce

Wednesday, March 01, 2017

Don't Panic, Feedback, Online Testing, Cheating

Dear Colleagues,

I will be out of town March 6-17 and back at work on Monday, March 20. I hope you have a good spring break.
Don't Panic
You have several support mechanisms here at UAA:
The IT Services Call Center at 786-4646 option 1 can handle tech issues, basic Blackboard questions and more. I call them at least once a week with a question or issue. Many are surprised to learn that the Call Center is open 7 am – 10 pm M-F and 10 am – 2 pm S-S during the academic year.
Academic Innovations and eLearning (AIE)provides instructional design, more complex Blackboard support and more. I collaborate with their designers and other staff. They are open 8 am – 5 pm M-F.
What Do They Think of Your Class?
A few years ago, I taught EDFN 302, Foundations of Educational Technology online. After each online class meeting, I asked my students to fill out a quick survey in Qualtrics:
  1. When did you feel most engaged in class tonight?
  2. When did you feel most distanced in class tonight?
  3. What about the activities and materials tonight surprised you the most?
  4. When did you feel most engaged with the homework?
  5. How much time did it take to do the homework?
  6. Add any other comments here.
I found that my students consistently liked the small group conversations in the breakout rooms. They were surprised at how interactive our online class sessions were and had given me some good feedback on how my teaching can be improved. I put the survey result in Blackboard so they can see what the group is thinking. Many of them read the results and were surprised by converging and diverging answers to the questions.
Even if you don't collect feedback every week, asking for feedback on the class and letting your students know the aggregate feedback and your response is a powerful way to engage them in the learning process and to improve your teaching.
Secure Online Testing
eLearning: Distance Student Services now offers online testing services with Remote Proctor Now (RPNow). eLearning: Distance Student Services has coordinated test proctoring for students at proctor sites (schools, universities, etc.) for years. Now, students can be in a secure online test environment anywhere.
If you are interested in learning more about RPNow, set up an appointment with eLearning: Online Testing Services Outreach
Cheating
I don't want to believe this article on cheating from Campus Technology that states 9 in 10 students admit to cheating. But it is sobering to think that cheating is rampant. The rationale stated by some students was that this is what they thought faculty did. That horrified me as well, though I realize it could be a rationalization. In any canse, it is important that we model ethical behavior. I also think we can design and grade our assessments to make cheating harder for the students and easier to catch for the faculty. It's also important to be clear about the consequences. And, based on my experience elsewhere, we must support our adjunct faculty in dealing with cheating.
Thank you,
Lee
Lee Maria Henrikson
Instructional Designer
UAA Community and Technical College
Building Alaska's Workforce